What were the most significant WW2 battles?

What were the most significant WW2 battles?

There were no insignificant battles in the war. However, there is clear proof that particular wars are more significant then other wars. The wars that would be classified as significant are the wars that are the most important and caused the most impact and maybe change the course of a whole war.

Many historians have described Stalingrad as the turning point of World War 2. It has been described as the Hitler’s demise. The war began with the axis powers heading into the Soviet Union (which at the time was classed as a superpower) on June 22nd 1941. The axis powers tried to siege the Russian city, Stalingrad. The war was the soviets against the Nazis and its allies (Romania, Italy, Slovakia etc.). Stalingrad was an industrial city and it also held the name of his rival Stalin. Stalin realised this and forced anyone who was able to hold a rifle to fight. This is seen as one of the most significant battles of World War 2 because Hitler lost 850,000 men. This is a quarter of the men fighting in the western front. They also lost a significant amount of supplies that they couldn’t recover. They were forced to retreat out of Eastern Europe causing the collapse of the Nazi empire. Stalingrad is arguably ‘the bloodiest battle in human history’.

Pearl Harbour is known for Japan’s surprise attack on America to cause immense destruction on Pearl Harbour. Pearl Harbour was a military bas in Hawaii. It was the base for the US Military action in the pacific. On December 7, 1941 the Japanese completely destroyed Pearl Harbour with dive bombers and fighter planes. The Americans were very angry with this and President Franklin Roosevelt declared war after Pearl Harbour. On December 11, 1941 Germany declared war on the US as Japan and Germany were in alliance. The attack on Pearl Harbour caused the Americans to lose 21 warships, 177 planes (on the ground) and over 2000 men. The Japanese lost only 29 planes and 100 people which seems a small price to pay for the damage dealt to the US. The main significance of the battle is that the US were involved in the war and that they declared war on Japan on the 7th December and the axis powers declared war on the US on 9th December.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki are best known for the droppings of atomic bombs. August 6, 1945 an atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and on august 9, 1945, an atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. The droppings of the bombs forced the Japanese to surrender and they had no option as they thought the Americans had more atomic bombs (even though the Americans only had 2 atomic bombs). The Americans believe that the bombings prevented the deaths of many people from both armies. The Japanese think otherwise. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the finishing part of the war that lead to the surrender of Japan and it is significant due to the impact that it had on Japan. As well as 214,000 people dying from the explosion the radioactive particles gave the bomb its venom. Many people were killed by the effects of radiation a long time after the war and at the time no one knew how severe the bombings were and how to cure or improve the conditions from radiation exposure. Due to the sheer power of the atomic bombs the Japanese were forced to surrender as they could not sustain another blow from an atomic bomb which gives this battle its significance as it ties up Japan and removes them from the war.


It would be foolish to say that any of the wars in world war 2 were insignificant but I have chosen these three wars to be the most significant because of the impact that they caused (especially Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Pearl Harbour) also the loss of men contributed to the significance for these wars and also in terms of the war Stalingrad was seen to be the bloodiest war ever and the turning point in the war. Pearl Harbour led to the introduction of the US and this lead to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the major blow that forced the Japanese to surrender. For these very reasons I would say that the three most significant battles were Stalingrad, Pearl Harbour and Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Popular posts from this blog

The inspector calls and how it relates to biblical parables.

The Parable of the Sower, The Good Samaritan, The Prodigal Son The Parable Of The Sower There was a farmer who went to sow some corn. He scattered the seeds in the field and the seeds fell in various places. Some of the seed fell on the path where it was eaten by birds and stepped on. Some of the seed fell on rocky ground, and the plants sprouted but dried up because the soil had no moisture. Some of the seed fell in a thorn bush and grew up but were choked by the thorns. Lastly some seed fell on good soil and the plants grew and produced lots of grains. Jesus then explains the parable and says: The seeds that fell on the path represent those who hear, but the devil comes and takes the message from the hearts and stops them from being saved. The seeds that fell on the rocky ground represent the people who except gods message gladly but it doesn’t sink in and when there faith is on the line they fade away The seeds that fall among thorn
Read more

How does Priestley convey his message in An Inspector Calls?

Being a co-founder of the Socialist Commonwealth Party, Priestley felt that his political views on socialism were very important and these views are displayed prominently throughout An Inspector Calls. Priestley uses characters to represent the different generations and also uses the Inspector as a mouthpiece to distribute his views; several critics describe the Inspector as Priestley’s alter ego. The Inspector conveys Priestley’s most important message, that a change in society’s attitude is required. Through Sheila’s words, “of course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we don’t already know yet” we can see that the Inspector is believed to be an omniscient presence. He speaks as if he is divine by referring to the people as men and during his last speech he says, “If men will not learn that lesson, they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.” These words are influenced by Priestley’s own experiences fighting in the First World War. Portraying the Inspec
Read more

Tybalt is to blame for this tragedy - Romeo and Juliet Essay

“Tybalt is to blame for this tragedy” discuss with reference to Act 3 Scene 1 On one hand, Tybalt is heavily involved in the build up to the tragedy in Romeo and Juliet; Shakespeare portrays him as a villainous character who is the cause of several deaths and misfortune. Throughout the play Shakespeare exposes Tybalt’s violent nature and his anger is particularly shown, when Tybalt confronts Romeo and insults him in Act 3 Scene 1 saying, ‘thou art a villain’. This, in the Elizabethan period was very insulting and shows how quick Tybalt is to start fights, proving that he is hot-tempered. Critics argue that Tybalt caused the tragedy as he encourages a brawl by inviting Romeo to ‘turn and draw’. Had Tybalt not said this, Mercutio would probably not have been provoked to fight and consequently die. As a result of Mercutio’s death, Romeo killed Tybalt, forcing Romeo to leave. This led to a chain of disastrous events resulting in Romeo’s, Juliet’s and Paris’ deaths. It can also be argu
Read more

The Mayor of Casterbridge - Why is the ring at Casterbridge a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan?

Why is the ring at Casterbridge a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan? There are a number of reasons why the Ring could be considered a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan. Firstly, Hardy makes it clear the Ring is not a place of happiness. It is described as a Roman amphitheatre in the heart of Casterbridge where no joy can be found, even for boys who tried to play cricket in it. He even accounts the story of a woman who murdered her husband being put at the stake in the Ring. This could suggest the Ring was a suitable place for the meeting as just as an evil woman was put to rest in the Ring, so will Henchard’s terrible and disgraceful mistake. As the Mayor of Casterbridge, Henchard is considered as a very respectable man and it would greatly damage his reputation if people discovered he had sold his wife and child. This is another reason the Ring was such a suitable place for the couple to meet as it is the “spot as being safest from observation which he cou
Read more

How does a river change along its course?

Image
Geography essay: how does a river change along its course? A river through the time that it exists changes its course from how it first began. The two parts of the river is the upper course and the lower course. These two parts of the river have very varied properties and do opposite things. Before finding out how a river changes on its course we must first know what a river does. Rivers do three main things: ·          Erosion (when water hits rocks and makes it wear away into silt) ·          Transportion (when the current of the water takes the silt with it) ·          Deposition (when the water leaves the silt behind) These things can be shown in a simple diagram: Erosion varies in the two courses. In the upper coarse vertical erosion takes place. In the lower coarse lateral erosion takes place. Other features of the upper and lower coarse are: ·          Small streams (upper) ·          Slow current (upper) ·          Mostly straight (upper) ·        
Read more

Why George R.R. Martin Reigns Supreme Over J.R.R. Tolkien

When it comes to the world of epic fantasy literature, two names stand out: George R.R. Martin and J.R.R. Tolkien. Both authors have captivated readers with their immersive worlds and richly crafted characters, but when it comes to comparing the two, George R.R. Martin undeniably takes the throne as the superior storyteller. One of the reasons why Martin surpasses Tolkien is his realistic and complex portrayal of human nature. Martin's characters are flawed, multi-dimensional, and morally ambiguous, making them relatable and compelling. He doesn't shy away from depicting the darker aspects of human behavior, such as political intrigue, betrayal, and the consequences of power struggles. In contrast, Tolkien's characters tend to be more archetypal, with clear-cut divisions between good and evil, and less depth in their motivations and actions. Furthermore, Martin's world-building is unparalleled in its intricacy and detail. The fictional realm of Westeros in his "A S
Read more