The inspector calls and how it relates to biblical parables.

The Parable of the Sower, The Good Samaritan, The Prodigal Son


The Parable Of The Sower

There was a farmer who went to sow some corn. He scattered the seeds in the field and the seeds fell in various places. Some of the seed fell on the path where it was eaten by birds and stepped on. Some of the seed fell on rocky ground, and the plants sprouted but dried up because the soil had no moisture. Some of the seed fell in a thorn bush and grew up but were choked by the thorns. Lastly some seed fell on good soil and the plants grew and produced lots of grains.

Jesus then explains the parable and says:

  • The seeds that fell on the path represent those who hear, but the devil comes and takes the message from the hearts and stops them from being saved.
  • The seeds that fell on the rocky ground represent the people who except gods message gladly but it doesn’t sink in and when there faith is on the line they fade away
  • The seeds that fall among thorn bushes represent the people who hear the word of god but the riches and pleasures of life choke them.
  • The seeds that fall on the good soil represent the good people who hear the word of god and absorb it and have an obedient heart and they do good things.

The Good Samaritan

The parable of the Good Samaritan is a response to one a Pharisee came to Jesus and asked who is my neighbour? Jesus then said there was once a man who was travelling from Jerusalem to Jericho but then robbers attacked him, beat him down, stripped him and left him half dead. After a while a priest came along on that same route from Jerusalem to Jericho and he saw the man and he didn’t want to get involved so he just walked on by on the opposite side of the road. Next a Levite (a Levite is a high person in Judaism and is someone who helps read the scripture) walked by and looked at the injured man and saw that he needed help yet walked by because he didn’t want to get involved. Then a Samaritan came by and saw the Jew on the floor (Jews and Samaritans weren’t very friendly with each other and should a Jew see a Samaritan he would walk on the other side of the road.) the Samaritan poured oil on the Jew’s wounds and bandaged them, took the man to an inn and paid for him. In case more money was needed the Samaritan said he would pay him next time he comes round.

The Prodigal Son

This parable is about a father who had two sons and the younger of the sons asked father for his share of the property now. The father was very sad but gave the younger son half of the property. After a few days the younger son sold his half of the property and fled to a distant land with lots of money. This younger son wasted his money and spent it recklessly. Then the younger son was forced to work in a farm and wished that he could get even the food that the pigs were getting. The younger son came to his senses and said that even my fathers servants get more food and do not get hungry.
So he got up and went to his father.
While the younger son was a long way from the house the father saw him and ran out and greeted him and hugged him. Then he told his servants to kill the prize calf and cook it and have a big party for his son had come back alive. The older son who had been working in the fields heard the music so he asked one of the servants what was the meaning of this. The servant said your brother has come back. He was furious! The older son went to his father and said all these years I have worked long and hard, never disobeyed your orders and you have given me nothing not even a calf to share with my friends but for this other son of yours who sold half your house you kill the prized calf for him. The father then replied my son, what is mine is yours and you have always been with me but we have to celebrate for your brother is dead and know is alive.

How the parables could be related to the inspector calls

I think that the parable of the sower is related to the inspector calls through the various types of seeds. I think that the seed that fell on the path represents Mr and Mrs Birling who know what is right and what is wrong but they aren’t sorry for what they did and wouldn’t change what they did if they had the chance to. I think that the seed that fell amongst the thorns represents Gerald as he wants to do what is right but in the end he is sorry to Sheila and not to Daisy Renton.

I think that the good Samaritan is related to the inspector calls through the fact how Mrs Birling who was supposed to be someone who is helping the poor rejects Eva smith just like how the priest or the Levite did. I think it could be related to the inspectors speech in which he says there are thousands of Eva smiths… and I think that because when the family realise that Eva smith didn’t die they don’t feel any remorse and they don’t care about the thousands of other Eva smiths in the world or you could say they don’t care about the thousands of other injured Jews.


I think that the parable of the prodigal son could be related to the inspector calls through Eva smith. Eva smith asked for extra wages just like the younger son asked for his share of the properties (under different circumstances). After Eva smith left Mr Birlings Company she had a nice life working at Millwards just like how the younger son was happy with all his money when Eva smith loses her job she gets herself in trouble just like when the famine came the younger son was in trouble. When she goes back to Mrs Birling she receives nothing the only contrast is that the younger son goes to get help and he does receive his fathers love.

Popular posts from this blog

How does Priestley convey his message in An Inspector Calls?

Being a co-founder of the Socialist Commonwealth Party, Priestley felt that his political views on socialism were very important and these views are displayed prominently throughout An Inspector Calls. Priestley uses characters to represent the different generations and also uses the Inspector as a mouthpiece to distribute his views; several critics describe the Inspector as Priestley’s alter ego. The Inspector conveys Priestley’s most important message, that a change in society’s attitude is required. Through Sheila’s words, “of course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we don’t already know yet” we can see that the Inspector is believed to be an omniscient presence. He speaks as if he is divine by referring to the people as men and during his last speech he says, “If men will not learn that lesson, they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.” These words are influenced by Priestley’s own experiences fighting in the First World War. Portraying the Inspec
Read more

Tybalt is to blame for this tragedy - Romeo and Juliet Essay

“Tybalt is to blame for this tragedy” discuss with reference to Act 3 Scene 1 On one hand, Tybalt is heavily involved in the build up to the tragedy in Romeo and Juliet; Shakespeare portrays him as a villainous character who is the cause of several deaths and misfortune. Throughout the play Shakespeare exposes Tybalt’s violent nature and his anger is particularly shown, when Tybalt confronts Romeo and insults him in Act 3 Scene 1 saying, ‘thou art a villain’. This, in the Elizabethan period was very insulting and shows how quick Tybalt is to start fights, proving that he is hot-tempered. Critics argue that Tybalt caused the tragedy as he encourages a brawl by inviting Romeo to ‘turn and draw’. Had Tybalt not said this, Mercutio would probably not have been provoked to fight and consequently die. As a result of Mercutio’s death, Romeo killed Tybalt, forcing Romeo to leave. This led to a chain of disastrous events resulting in Romeo’s, Juliet’s and Paris’ deaths. It can also be argu
Read more

The Mayor of Casterbridge - Why is the ring at Casterbridge a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan?

Why is the ring at Casterbridge a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan? There are a number of reasons why the Ring could be considered a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan. Firstly, Hardy makes it clear the Ring is not a place of happiness. It is described as a Roman amphitheatre in the heart of Casterbridge where no joy can be found, even for boys who tried to play cricket in it. He even accounts the story of a woman who murdered her husband being put at the stake in the Ring. This could suggest the Ring was a suitable place for the meeting as just as an evil woman was put to rest in the Ring, so will Henchard’s terrible and disgraceful mistake. As the Mayor of Casterbridge, Henchard is considered as a very respectable man and it would greatly damage his reputation if people discovered he had sold his wife and child. This is another reason the Ring was such a suitable place for the couple to meet as it is the “spot as being safest from observation which he cou
Read more

How does a river change along its course?

Image
Geography essay: how does a river change along its course? A river through the time that it exists changes its course from how it first began. The two parts of the river is the upper course and the lower course. These two parts of the river have very varied properties and do opposite things. Before finding out how a river changes on its course we must first know what a river does. Rivers do three main things: ·          Erosion (when water hits rocks and makes it wear away into silt) ·          Transportion (when the current of the water takes the silt with it) ·          Deposition (when the water leaves the silt behind) These things can be shown in a simple diagram: Erosion varies in the two courses. In the upper coarse vertical erosion takes place. In the lower coarse lateral erosion takes place. Other features of the upper and lower coarse are: ·          Small streams (upper) ·          Slow current (upper) ·          Mostly straight (upper) ·        
Read more

Why George R.R. Martin Reigns Supreme Over J.R.R. Tolkien

When it comes to the world of epic fantasy literature, two names stand out: George R.R. Martin and J.R.R. Tolkien. Both authors have captivated readers with their immersive worlds and richly crafted characters, but when it comes to comparing the two, George R.R. Martin undeniably takes the throne as the superior storyteller. One of the reasons why Martin surpasses Tolkien is his realistic and complex portrayal of human nature. Martin's characters are flawed, multi-dimensional, and morally ambiguous, making them relatable and compelling. He doesn't shy away from depicting the darker aspects of human behavior, such as political intrigue, betrayal, and the consequences of power struggles. In contrast, Tolkien's characters tend to be more archetypal, with clear-cut divisions between good and evil, and less depth in their motivations and actions. Furthermore, Martin's world-building is unparalleled in its intricacy and detail. The fictional realm of Westeros in his "A S
Read more