Tybalt is to blame for this tragedy - Romeo and Juliet Essay

“Tybalt is to blame for this tragedy” discuss with reference to Act 3 Scene 1

On one hand, Tybalt is heavily involved in the build up to the tragedy in Romeo and Juliet; Shakespeare portrays him as a villainous character who is the cause of several deaths and misfortune. Throughout the play Shakespeare exposes Tybalt’s violent nature and his anger is particularly shown, when Tybalt confronts Romeo and insults him in Act 3 Scene 1 saying, ‘thou art a villain’. This, in the Elizabethan period was very insulting and shows how quick Tybalt is to start fights, proving that he is hot-tempered. Critics argue that Tybalt caused the tragedy as he encourages a brawl by inviting Romeo to ‘turn and draw’. Had Tybalt not said this, Mercutio would probably not have been provoked to fight and consequently die. As a result of Mercutio’s death, Romeo killed Tybalt, forcing Romeo to leave. This led to a chain of disastrous events resulting in Romeo’s, Juliet’s and Paris’ deaths. It can also be argued that Tybalt is to blame as he triggers the fights and seems to cause of the unfortunate events. The importance of Tybalt’s invitation to ‘turn and draw’ is also explored by Baz Luhrmann in the 1996 film adaptation of the play; the character repeats the phrase several times. This draws attention to the words and again makes it seem like Tybalt was the cause of the deaths as he started the fights. Tybalt believes that he has the right to kill Romeo, saying ‘To strike him dead I hold it not a sin’ as Romeo attended the Capulet’s party despite the feud. This suggests that Tybalt believes in the Old Testament principle of Lex Talionis - an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Luhrmann conveys the religious and traditional aspects of Tybalt by his clothing which has pictures of Jesus Christ and all his weapons have the Capulet family crest on it. Tybalt’s ruthlessness and sense of family loyalty suggest that he is indeed to blame for this tragedy.


On the other hand, even thought Tybalt is a major influence in the play, some may say he is not the sole cause of the tragedy. Tybalt may feel he is just bringing justice to his family; the tragedies that follow are just unfortunate and completely out of Tybalt’s hands. Mainly, because he is dead, but also as other characters are responsible for their own actions.  It can also be argued that Tybalt was not completely at fault as other characters were involved in the brawl as well. At the beginning of Act 3 Scene 1, Benvolio says ‘the day is hot and the Capels abroad, and if we meet we shall not escape a brawl.’ It seems Benvolio anticipated that there would be trouble and maybe if he, prevented his friends from fighting, the tragedy could have been prevented. In addition, Mercutio is not totally innocent he, with amusement, mocks Tybalt making him increasingly angry and in a way this also starts the brawl. In some ways Mercutio is more to blame than Tybalt for the fight. Tybalt becomes involved due to family loyalty and pride, whereas Mercutio joins in for amusement. This is evident when, as soon as Tybalt and his men enter, Tybalt asks politely, ‘a word with one of you’ and Mercutio instantly mocks Tybalt replying, ‘make it a word and a blow’. Mercutio continues to mock and tease Tybalt throughout build up to the brawl on several occasions. For example, when he says ‘Thou make minstrels of us’ and ‘I’ll be hanged if he wear your livery’, this shows, Mercutio purposely misinterpreting Tybalt’s comments and trying to goad him into a fight. Tybalt tries to ignore Mercutio’s provocative comments making it clear he only wants to fight with Romeo, saying ‘peace be with you sir, here comes my man’. Tybalt’s comment of ‘turn and draw’ is directed solely to Romeo, who backs away from this invitation and Mercutio chooses this moment to intervene further by joining in a physical fight and drawing his sword well before Tybalt. If Mercutio was not so eager to fight, Tybalt may possibly have listened to Romeo’s explanation and maybe the fight could have been prevented. Tybalt only draws his own sword after being insulted by Mercutio, who calls him the ‘king of cats’. Therefore, in a way Mercutio seems to be the one to blame for the tragedy as he provokes Tybalt first. Furthermore, viewers of the play may argue that the tragedy is a combination of the other characters’ faults as well. Tybalt and Paris actually died at the hands of Romeo and his suicide led to Juliet killing herself. However, in a way it seems easier to blame Tybalt for the tragedy because of the manner in which Shakespeare portrays him as someone who hates ‘peace’ as he hates ‘hell’ and ‘Montagues’. This is a contrast to the amiable character traits of the others, such as Mercutio who is shown to be funny and friendly and Romeo who is shown to loving. Due to this, the audience are more inclined to favour Romeo and Mercutio and blame Tybalt even though he cannot be solely blamed as other characters clearly played a major part in the final tragedies as well. 

Popular posts from this blog

The inspector calls and how it relates to biblical parables.

The Parable of the Sower, The Good Samaritan, The Prodigal Son The Parable Of The Sower There was a farmer who went to sow some corn. He scattered the seeds in the field and the seeds fell in various places. Some of the seed fell on the path where it was eaten by birds and stepped on. Some of the seed fell on rocky ground, and the plants sprouted but dried up because the soil had no moisture. Some of the seed fell in a thorn bush and grew up but were choked by the thorns. Lastly some seed fell on good soil and the plants grew and produced lots of grains. Jesus then explains the parable and says: The seeds that fell on the path represent those who hear, but the devil comes and takes the message from the hearts and stops them from being saved. The seeds that fell on the rocky ground represent the people who except gods message gladly but it doesn’t sink in and when there faith is on the line they fade away The seeds that fall among thorn...
Read more

How does Priestley convey his message in An Inspector Calls?

Being a co-founder of the Socialist Commonwealth Party, Priestley felt that his political views on socialism were very important and these views are displayed prominently throughout An Inspector Calls. Priestley uses characters to represent the different generations and also uses the Inspector as a mouthpiece to distribute his views; several critics describe the Inspector as Priestley’s alter ego. The Inspector conveys Priestley’s most important message, that a change in society’s attitude is required. Through Sheila’s words, “of course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we don’t already know yet” we can see that the Inspector is believed to be an omniscient presence. He speaks as if he is divine by referring to the people as men and during his last speech he says, “If men will not learn that lesson, they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.” These words are influenced by Priestley’s own experiences fighting in the First World War. Portraying the Inspec...
Read more

Why George R.R. Martin Reigns Supreme Over J.R.R. Tolkien

When it comes to the world of epic fantasy literature, two names stand out: George R.R. Martin and J.R.R. Tolkien. Both authors have captivated readers with their immersive worlds and richly crafted characters, but when it comes to comparing the two, George R.R. Martin undeniably takes the throne as the superior storyteller. One of the reasons why Martin surpasses Tolkien is his realistic and complex portrayal of human nature. Martin's characters are flawed, multi-dimensional, and morally ambiguous, making them relatable and compelling. He doesn't shy away from depicting the darker aspects of human behavior, such as political intrigue, betrayal, and the consequences of power struggles. In contrast, Tolkien's characters tend to be more archetypal, with clear-cut divisions between good and evil, and less depth in their motivations and actions. Furthermore, Martin's world-building is unparalleled in its intricacy and detail. The fictional realm of Westeros in his "A S...
Read more

The Mayor of Casterbridge - Why is the ring at Casterbridge a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan?

Why is the ring at Casterbridge a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan? There are a number of reasons why the Ring could be considered a suitable place for Henchard to meet Susan. Firstly, Hardy makes it clear the Ring is not a place of happiness. It is described as a Roman amphitheatre in the heart of Casterbridge where no joy can be found, even for boys who tried to play cricket in it. He even accounts the story of a woman who murdered her husband being put at the stake in the Ring. This could suggest the Ring was a suitable place for the meeting as just as an evil woman was put to rest in the Ring, so will Henchard’s terrible and disgraceful mistake. As the Mayor of Casterbridge, Henchard is considered as a very respectable man and it would greatly damage his reputation if people discovered he had sold his wife and child. This is another reason the Ring was such a suitable place for the couple to meet as it is the “spot as being safest from observation which he cou...
Read more

What is the most influential passage in the Bible?

  The Bible is one of the most widely-read and influential books in human history. It is the primary religious text for Christians and is considered a source of guidance, wisdom, and spiritual insight. Throughout the Bible, there are many passages that have had a profound impact on the world and have shaped the course of human history. One of the most influential Bible passages is the Sermon on the Mount, found in the Gospel of Matthew. The Sermon on the Mount is a collection of teachings and sayings of Jesus, delivered on a mountainside to a large crowd of followers. The sermon is recorded in Matthew 5-7 and covers a wide range of topics, including morality, ethics, prayer, and faith. It includes some of the most famous teachings of Jesus, such as the Beatitudes, the Lord's Prayer, and the Golden Rule. The Beatitudes, found in Matthew 5:3-12, are a series of blessings that describe the characteristics and virtues of a blessed life. These blessings have been interpreted in differen...
Read more