To what extent was Jesus a pacifist?
To what extent was Jesus a pacifist?
To make a decision on whether Jesus was a pacifist must
first clarify what i mean when we say pacifist. A pacifist is someone who
believes violence is not the answer to solving problems. A pacifist feels that
war is destructive, murderous and unnecessary. A pacifist would rather rely on
negotiation, diplomacy and empathy to achieve resolutions to problems.
Pacifists can often be split into to groups, Total Pacifists, people who would
never use violence under any circumstance and Partial Pacifists, people who
believe that violence should only be used as a last resort in self defence. Now
that I have clarified what a pacifist is, I must compare how Jesus is shown in
the bible and compare it with this definition of a pacifist.
One of the arguments for Jesus being a pacifist is because
he said: “Blessed are the peacemakers for they will be called the children of
God” in the Gospel of Matthew. This would suggest clearly that Jesus is a
pacifist as he is promoting peaceful behaviour and says how it is rewarded in
the Beatitudes. Another occasion where Jesus shows that he would be a pacifist
is in the garden
of Gethsemane before he
was arrested, “When Jesus’ followers saw what was going to happen, they said,
‘Lord, should we strike with our swords?’ And one of them struck the servant of
the high priest, cutting off his right ear. But Jesus answered, ‘No more of
this!’ And he touched the man’s ear and healed him.” This shows that once more
Jesus was against violence and tells of Peter for attempting to defend Jesus.
On the other hand, Jesus could be perceived as someone who
is not a pacifist. This is reflected in his behaviour in the temple, when he
drives out the money changers. “Jesus entered the temple area and drove out all
who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the
money-changers and the benches of those selling doves. ‘It is written,’ he said
to them. ‘My house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a
den of robbers.’ ”. This would clearly show that Jesus was very angry and would
suggest that he is not a pacifist as he himself is participating in an act of
violence. This would suggest that Jesus feels that violence is ok and can be
tolerated if it is for the right reasons. However although Jesus did drive the
money-changers out he did not actually attack the money changers themselves and
did not harm them and it could be argued that Jesus was only destroying the
idea of people running the temple like a business.
Although there is much evidence that would suggest that
Jesus is not a pacifist there is further evidence to suggest that he is a
pacifist. This is on the Sermon on the Mount when jesus says, “You have heard
that it was said, 'An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.' But I tell you,
do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn
to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let
him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him
two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who
wants to borrow from you.” Many people would argue that this quote promotes
total pacifism however because of the earlier act of violence shown by jesus
many people would conclude that overall jesus would be a partial pacifist and
is not fully a pacifist as he himself used violence to drive out the tax
collectors and money changers in the temple.